Within this last week of the semester, I have been doing a lot of learning. All of this learning has increased the amount of stress and reduced the amount of time for trivial things.
As it turns out, some were not that trivial. In the spirit of sharing knowledge for the good of humanity, Febreeze is not a perfect substitute for washing clothes especially if the clothes are still on one's body as it induces itching and wet spots that take a while to dry.
Showing posts with label education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label education. Show all posts
Saturday, December 13, 2008
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
Jonathan Alter's Tips to Obama Regarding Education
Alter's article proposed that the source of America's educational downfall is the lack of accountability within the teachers. He claims, "Give poor kids from broken homes the best teachers, and most learn. Period." Alter advises Obama to pay teachers according to their results and release them if they can't produce.
The teachers need to be accountable, but is measuring the students' performance on state tests the best way to monitor their teaching skills? Is this the best way to improve education? This measurement system seems to deter teachers from taking on a challenging class or allowing gifted students the opportunity to be in the same classroom.
As many educational theorists point out, people have different learning styles and different strengths. Teachers are no different. Part of the problem within education is the lack of matching teachers with appropriate work environments. Some incredible teachers would fail miserably if placed into a different environment. Simply taking the best teachers out of their schools and moving them into failing schools may not be an effective solution. The structure of the school makes a difference in a teacher's ability to teach. The administration should provide an environment that sustains the teacher's efforts with appropriate discipline support and encouraging professional development.
There is not a multitude of well-educated, talented individuals who want to be teachers, especially in "at risk" schools. The threat of being released may further prevent good teachers risking their careers in such a school. If the accountability was based on state scores as suggested, the content within the classroom would be directly tied to the test. This is already the case in most public schools since the school itself is already tied the the test performance. Is that what education should be? There is value in teaching a body of knowledge, but with such pressure, exam preparation takes up much of the time that could be devoted to experiments, plays, and projects. The great teachers know that these items are necessary in developing the interest, thinking skills, and the real world abilities in their students. The increase of content regulations discourages the most creative teachers from staying in the profession.
Teachers should be accountable, and state tests provide hard data. Unfortunately the data is incapable of telling the whole story.
The teachers need to be accountable, but is measuring the students' performance on state tests the best way to monitor their teaching skills? Is this the best way to improve education? This measurement system seems to deter teachers from taking on a challenging class or allowing gifted students the opportunity to be in the same classroom.
As many educational theorists point out, people have different learning styles and different strengths. Teachers are no different. Part of the problem within education is the lack of matching teachers with appropriate work environments. Some incredible teachers would fail miserably if placed into a different environment. Simply taking the best teachers out of their schools and moving them into failing schools may not be an effective solution. The structure of the school makes a difference in a teacher's ability to teach. The administration should provide an environment that sustains the teacher's efforts with appropriate discipline support and encouraging professional development.
There is not a multitude of well-educated, talented individuals who want to be teachers, especially in "at risk" schools. The threat of being released may further prevent good teachers risking their careers in such a school. If the accountability was based on state scores as suggested, the content within the classroom would be directly tied to the test. This is already the case in most public schools since the school itself is already tied the the test performance. Is that what education should be? There is value in teaching a body of knowledge, but with such pressure, exam preparation takes up much of the time that could be devoted to experiments, plays, and projects. The great teachers know that these items are necessary in developing the interest, thinking skills, and the real world abilities in their students. The increase of content regulations discourages the most creative teachers from staying in the profession.
Teachers should be accountable, and state tests provide hard data. Unfortunately the data is incapable of telling the whole story.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)